The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell. An extremely good read on the power of word-of-mouth in spreading epidemics,  be it brand, product, lifestyle, whatever. I finally finished reading this book. It took me awhile because of school and such.

I came upon a stunning idea during the last chapter. The power of the social network is growing ever more in our society. It is becoming the most valuable channel to which we can connect with people. It first began with phone lines. The telephone made communication the epitomy of ease in a time when it took a physical deliverer sometimes months to confirm a message. Telephony evolved into faxing evolved into sms evolved into cellular telephony and email.

Generally in a capitalistic economy value or price rises as quantity falls and vice versa. This is true with every product or service except the "network". In order for a telephone to have value it must be able to call another telephone. Same with faxes, sms, and emails. We need more and more receivers in order to build the network. As the network grows it becomes more and more valuable. Look at MySpace and Facebook and all of the other social networking platforms. The value in the market for each of these are well into the millions and billions of dollars. As the network grows it becomes more powerful, as corporations are often said to become more powerful with additions. However, one may difference between a giant corporation and a giant network [Although arguably they are one in the same only governed by different rule sets.] is that a giant corporation becomes increasingly unstable and difficult to be managed while the network, managed by its users, is completely stable.

Can multi-million dollar corporations learn from the stable network? Maybe but I highly doubt it. Can I learn from the success of the stable network? OF COURSE! In its inherent contradiction of value I give the network the most value. The network decides what is important and not important, relevant and irrelevant, what I can use and can’t use. Hmm… WHAT I CAN USE? An interesting concept. Let’s see here. First I can use mediums, i.e. video, words, audio, and graphics. That seems to encompass most mediums. I can use feedback and connections to spark conversation. Conversation… hmmm… This could be my tool, my paintbrush, my mouse-click, my pencil. Conversation can help me to outline what really matters to the rest of the world, and adapt my message to the content which is relevant. Now my content is relevant. How to spread it? Let’s go back to my mediums. What I am spreading determines my medium. Do people want to hear my message, see my message, or experience my message? I’ll leave it up to them to decide. I am here to provide and facilitate they are here to filter and facilitate. It’s a two way street. It’s the Main Street of information. The Main Street of the future. "Person to Person communications is much bigger than marketing.  It is about making the world ours, again." –David Weinberger via Shel Israel

I know… long post. Lots of words. Thanks for reading though. I’ll try to include pics next time to liven things up a bit. –KP

The era of the newspaper seems to be dying out. But I wonder if there is actually any real danger to the life of this industry with the onset of major news being read through an online medium. I wonder if newspapers will become extinct. Many questions arise when trying to decide whether or not the online era will replace the paper era. I ask these questions in light of a documentary that I have been following by PBS Frontline called News War. It is a 4 part series on the forces affecting news media today.

Another focus the documentary accounts is the growing disparity between our government and the press. This is also a major topic which I will make a follow-up post on as soon I can. For now lets focus on what exactly is causing newspapers to retreat and how they can remain as much a part of culture today as they have been for many years past.

First, newspapers need an audience or else they cease to exist indefinitely. The audience one would argue have been those people who want to read the news. People who want to read the news range in age from those just beginning to read to those losing their eyesight. I do not think we can accurately portray a set "class" of society to read newspapers overall. Let us rule out those who do not need, persay a newspaper to read current news. At home we use personal computers, televisions, and radios; the former of the three being the most widely accepted today. When we go to work we have our cellphones, pda’s, laptops, car radios, etc to give us live news updates by the minute. "What if I take the subway where none of those devices can receive a signal?", you ask. Well, my answer to you is to store your news on a pda, cell phone, ipod, or other mobile device with a hard drive before you leave home. At work, we now have access to a network which provides an endless stream of news via the internet and broadcasting. On the way home from work we have similar means as going to work. In our daily lives we have no NEED for a newspaper. Even on vacation there is no need for a newspaper. Increasingly the entire world is becoming networked. Now we can say that the people who NEED newspapers are the people who do not have these conveniences. That right there is a stable audience because there will always be someone who doesn’t have the means or desire to use and acquire these devices. Finally, the rest of the audience would consist of those who want to have a physical paper to read by mere preference. I know people who swear by reading pixel news and I know others who remain faithful to print news. It is similar to the contesting between cable and network news channels. There are some who are true to FOX, there are others true to CNN, there are others true to NBC, there are others true to ABC … you get the point. So there are two areas in which print news will find an audience, those who don’t embrace technology and those who just like to "read the paper".

Now that we have an audience, we can begin selling our paper. Wait! We need content for our paper. [Generally these two, audience and content, go hand-in-hand. They need each other symbiotically and you can't have one before the other.] Content. Hmm… Content entails generation, interpretation, and reproduction. Generation of the content would be the reporter, journalist, discovering what is important "news" by obtaining information from sources and observation. The next step is to interpret the information. Form it into content by giving it foundation, relevancy, and purpose. Finally the information must be reproduced in auser-friendlyfashion.

Now one question… is there any way that content would be abolished or not allowed to function? Looking at the process I do not see any method of destroying content besides allowing a dictatorshiptorestrict and regulatethe method of content. This would abolish the "free" nature of content, not necessarily content itself, implicating not only news"papers" but also news"pixels".

With a content and an audience to view it there will always be an outlet to convey news via paper medium.

Reading Shel Israel’s post, Global Neighbourhoods: Global Neighborhoods V4 Overview Part 2., struck a note within me to bring this out even more.

The concept of a generation of young people ushering in a time of
change is on many minds these days. I can honestly say that I am
embracing this endeavor in order to further the progression of our
world. A young person living and breathing a world of community and
innovation is key. I see this young man or woman challenging the once
stable precendents laid down in areas of medical care, social security,
immigration, and public policy as a whole. Shel states:

It
is true that this new generation has little need for television,
newspapers, magazines, and in some cases books. The internet is the new
mall, the new bowling alley, the new playground. It is where those, who
so recently have been able to influence the greatest of minds and
businesses, gather to share ideas and information. YouTube is growing
larger and larger everyday. Until a few months ago I was using YouTube
merely to view interesting videos; now I link videos to friends and
colleagues in an effort to spread a message. Social media is taking
this world by storm and the users, the "New Now" generation, are
feeding it ever more.

I can honestly say as a young person myself that I cannot help but
notice the passion and drive in my peers and even in myself to change
and progress as a community of humans. Humanity is the key and we
realize this. With the onset of green technology and policy reform, the
next step may even be a worldwide social equity reform. We are all
linked across the country and across the globe via social networks such
as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, LinkedIn, and the rest of the
blogosphere. A growing community of diverse minds and spirits are in
store for the coming years.

Long post, I know. Leave some comments and link away. I’d appreciate it as a beginner in this blogging world. –KP