Checking out Google’s Website Optimizer, a few things caught my eye. First of all, the help section is VERY helpful. Not only does it address possible questions about how to, why to, and when to… but it makes use of conversational mediums to receive feedback. For example, be considered for a free demo of Google AdWords–> I don’t just want to be considered, I want to TRY it. In fact, maybe Google should make this offer to not just be considered but to actually test it out on your own website [of course with a time period so that we don't see a drop in web consultants worldwide].

I thought that this "multi-variate" testing layout which AdWords is based on is very similar to how television researchers discover which elements of their shows appeal to their target audience. For example, the creators of Sesame Street spent a lot of time optimizing the television show for viewing by young children. They discovered, through testing combinations of elements within and without their show, that children responded positively to the puppet characters interacting with humans on the show.

"Results showed that test watchers were entranced when the ad-like segments aired, especially those with the jovial puppets, but were remarkably less interested in the street scenes. Psychologists warned CTW against a mixture of fantasy and reality elements, but producers soon decided to mix the elements."-wikipedia on Sesame Street

Sesame Street is an innovator of television watching, by providing a new path of education-entertainment mashed segments. Much like the eCommerce websites of today which are taking the world by storm. With more and more people converting to online shopping as opposed to in-person shopping, greater focus must be presented on the layout and substance of eCommerce sites. Google AdWords takes this concept to a wonderful level by providing a simple and affordable tool designed to optimize websites.

Check out FutureNow’s post by Anthony Garcia on "64 Tips to getting started with Google Website Optimizer"

Bebo CarDomain Facebook MySpace Flickr LinkedIn Friendster IMVU Ruckus Yelp Virb

All social networking sites, of different types naturally. I, personally, don’t have any need for this many different social networks. My uses of SNsites are primarily: business, music, and college. I assign one site to each of my uses. The reason I do this is because I feel that a site which focuses on a particular niche is much better at informing me of what I want to know in that niche. It is never good in any situation for one to spread themselves over many networks, in effect thinning their usability.

A recently promoted social networking site, Virb, which I was made aware of while perusing a piece by Brian Oberkirch, [His article really inspired this entire post, Cheers Brian!] combines opinion, pictures, as well as music into their platform. In effect putting the uses of Flickr, Last.FM, and Facebook into one unique platform. The only target worthwhile for them would be the newest generation of internet users. This is so because most of today’s internet users are already on a couple social networks where all of their friends frequent and of which are relevant to their interests. Why would I move over to Virb from my 4 main SNsites when everyone I know and care about are on the 4 main SNsites? It is not logistically sound to move myself and all of my acquaintences over to a new portal.

I wonder, How many people are willing to switch their networks? It is similar to getting a haircut, generally once you find someone who takes good care of your hair you stick with them. My 4 SNsites take good care of my social networking needs and I will stick with them. There are those sites however which have taken a seat on the back burner to make way for the mainstreamers MySpace and Facebook. These back burner sites, LiveJournal- Xanga-, were beginners in the social networking realm but were put away because of a younger generation of users’ grapple of new media. What is it about MySpace and Facebook that were so revolutionary? EASY! Their platform integrated ways to display and SHARE information.

People love to display themselves. They love to show off. Hence, the "MySpace TOP 8" and "MySpace pics". People love to share items with their friends, coworkers, and even strangers. "Facebook’s View Friends" feature, "Facebook’s Share a Link" feature, as well as many more. These networking sites saw a solution and optimized it for usability. What more can be optimized? Optimization will come. Soon enough MySpace and Facebook will become extinct as a result of technology advancements. Look at the Apple TV, a new piece of technology which some think will revolutionize the way we watch television. Instead of waiting for programs to come on or instead of recording them via DVR, we can browse iTunes and other Apple compatible outlets for the shows/movies we want to see. I expect soon enough an advance in networking usability. I do wonder what it could/will be.
 

DRm is going down! Well… maybe not, but Apple and EMI Group Plc. have just reached an agreement allowing the free spread of EMI label’s music on iTunes. This means greater and greater freedom for those internet bodies who download and spread music, beginning trends and oftentimes greater success for artists. EMI is the licensed distributor for music of 60’s pop band, The Beatles.

Also, I noticed, that Puretracks, another music license holder had abolished DRm protection for their music! 2007 is slowly giving way to a rise in the death rate of DRm protected tracks. Who knows how many more companies will join in. Maybe some, maybe none, maybe a lot. I will definitely be keeping track of who, when, and why.

I do fully support the sale of music, and contributing to an artists hard work and willingness to share their talent with the rest of us. [That sounds a bit-- tacky--]